Peer Reviews

October 2023 (157 Words, 1 Minutes)

Nitin’s group(College Rankings)

• HOOK:(Points: 3.6-4.0)
• Reason:

• Very interesting concept and good execution

• KNOWLEDGE: (Points: 3.6-4.0)
• Reason:

• Some members seemed to not understand the code upon further questioning of how it works.

• VALUE: (Points: 0.6-1.0)
• Reason:

• Very useful website in the real world.

• WOW FACTOR
• Reason:

• The website looked amazing and was unique but a bigger variety of colors could have been included

• 9/10

Trevor’s Group(Images)

• USAGE OF:

• Frontend

• Backend

• API

• Agile

• HOOK: 3.9

• Reason: The site was introduced nicely and it looked very nice and captured my attention

• KNOWLEDGE (3.6-4): 4

• Reason: Each team member was able to explain the code very nicely and obviously knew what they were doing

• VALUE (0.6-1.0): 0.9

• Reason: I can see the potential that this site has and with some bug fixing, it could be a really useful website

• WOW FACTOR:

• Comments: The website looked very clean and modern. The animations were also very nice

• Total: 8.8/9

Tejas’s Group(Food)

• Hook: 3.7

• Could have been introduced better

• Knowledge: 3.8

• Showed understanding of the code upon questioning.

• Value: 0.9

• I think that this is a really good concept and the idea could be expanded on more.

• WOW FACTOR: 0.7
• Frontend could be better with more color.

Tanav’s Group

• Frontend

• Backend

• API

• Agile

• HOOK:
• Points: 3.9

• Good introduction but not the most user friendly for newer people.

• KNOWLEDGE:
• Points: 3.6
• Reason:

• Seemed to lack a deeper knowledge of the code when asked further questions.

• VALUE:
• Points: 0.7
• Reason:

• The project could be expanded on to make it better.

• WOW FACTOR: 0.8

• Reason:

• Very pretty website with nice visual features. Blender model was amazing.

• 9/10 - Work on understanding code and expanding on the project.